Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre was 0.0208 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe stood at 0.0208 ha per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 1.5% on the previous year and up 4.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.0517 ha per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0168 ha per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Zimbabwe 76th out of 126 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0168 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0173 ha per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1963 | 0.0178 ha per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0178 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0178 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0181 ha per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0189 ha per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1968 | 0.0194 ha per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0202 ha per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0207 ha per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0209 ha per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0215 ha per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1973 | 0.022 ha per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1974 | 0.022 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.0227 ha per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1976 | 0.0233 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0246 ha per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0246 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0258 ha per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0271 ha per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0284 ha per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1982 | 0.03 ha per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1983 | 0.031 ha per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0323 ha per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0331 ha per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1986 | 0.0336 ha per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0344 ha per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1988 | 0.0359 ha per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0375 ha per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0388 ha per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1991 | 0.0401 ha per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0388 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1993 | 0.0414 ha per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1994 | 0.0419 ha per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1995 | 0.0427 ha per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0439 ha per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1997 | 0.044 ha per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0439 ha per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1999 | 0.0441 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0452 ha per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0465 ha per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0472 ha per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0491 ha per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0516 ha per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0517 ha per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0487 ha per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0439 ha per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2008 | 0.0316 ha per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0279 ha per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0254 ha per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2011 | 0.0238 ha per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0206 ha per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2013 | 0.02 ha per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0194 ha per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.0193 ha per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0185 ha per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2017 | 0.0186 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0185 ha per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0186 ha per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0195 ha per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0203 ha per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0205 ha per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0208 ha per square kilometre | +1.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0182 ha per square kilometre | 0.0168 ha per square kilometre | 0.0202 ha per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0228 ha per square kilometre | 0.0207 ha per square kilometre | 0.0258 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0323 ha per square kilometre | 0.0271 ha per square kilometre | 0.0375 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0419 ha per square kilometre | 0.0388 ha per square kilometre | 0.0441 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0444 ha per square kilometre | 0.0279 ha per square kilometre | 0.0517 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0203 ha per square kilometre | 0.0185 ha per square kilometre | 0.0254 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0203 ha per square kilometre | 0.0195 ha per square kilometre | 0.0208 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 73 Guinea-Bissau 0.0258 ha per square kilometre compare
- 74 Cyprus 0.0249 ha per square kilometre compare
- 75 New Caledonia 0.0223 ha per square kilometre compare
- 77 Paraguay 0.0205 ha per square kilometre compare
- 78 France 0.0202 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Yemen 0.0196 ha per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 34.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0947 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 286.19 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8815 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.595 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 9.47 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 9.47 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe?
- Bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre in Zimbabwe was 0.0208 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0517 ha per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0168 ha per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre?
- Zimbabwe ranks 76th out of 126 countries with data for 2023.
- Is bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Bananas — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Bananas — Area harvested ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Bananas — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Bananas — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.