New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.0223 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0208 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
75th
Zimbabwe rank
76th

Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0223 ha per square kilometre against 0.0208 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0015 ha per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 126 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0341 ha per square kilometre 0.0182 ha per square kilometre 0.0159 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.041 ha per square kilometre 0.0228 ha per square kilometre 0.0182 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0385 ha per square kilometre 0.0323 ha per square kilometre 0.0062 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0186 ha per square kilometre 0.0419 ha per square kilometre 0.0234 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0232 ha per square kilometre 0.0444 ha per square kilometre 0.0212 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.021 ha per square kilometre 0.0203 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0242 ha per square kilometre 0.0203 ha per square kilometre 0.0039 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 0.0223 ha per square kilometre against 0.0208 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0.0015 ha per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for bananas — area harvested, per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 76th of 126 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/bananas-area-harvested-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Bananas — Area harvested, per square kilometre
Unit
ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
127 places, 6,218 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Bananas — Area harvested divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.