Least developed countries vs Turkmenistan: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production

Least developed countries
145,537 t
in 2013
Turkmenistan
60,800 t
in 2013
Least developed countries rank
15th
Turkmenistan rank
15th

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Turkmenistan
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 145,537 t against 60,800 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 84,737 t.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 2.4 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 15th and Turkmenistan ranks 15th of 26 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 118,774 t 30,300 t 88,474 t Least developed countries
2000s 131,842 t 51,390 t 80,452 t Least developed countries
2010s 147,506 t 60,800 t 86,706 t Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — production, Least developed countries or Turkmenistan?
Least developed countries, at 145,537 t against 60,800 t in Turkmenistan as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — production between Least developed countries and Turkmenistan?
84,737 t, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Turkmenistan?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Least developed countries and Turkmenistan rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — production?
Least developed countries ranks 15th and Turkmenistan ranks 15th of 26 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Turkmenistan: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-production/least-developed-countries/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-production/least-developed-countries/turkmenistan/">Least developed countries vs Turkmenistan: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 5,812 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.