Least developed countries vs Morocco: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses

Least developed countries
145,712 t
in 2013
Morocco
66,902 t
in 2013
Least developed countries rank
16th
Morocco rank
9th

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Morocco
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119872013

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 145,712 t against 66,902 t in Morocco, a difference of 78,810 t.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 2.2 times Morocco's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 16th and Morocco ranks 9th of 28 groups.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 78,213 t 21,129 t 57,085 t Least developed countries
1970s 82,339 t 26,370 t 55,969 t Least developed countries
1980s 80,497 t 39,941 t 40,556 t Least developed countries
1990s 122,112 t 55,676 t 66,436 t Least developed countries
2000s 140,980 t 65,227 t 75,752 t Least developed countries
2010s 149,888 t 69,797 t 80,092 t Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — other uses, Least developed countries or Morocco?
Least developed countries, at 145,712 t against 66,902 t in Morocco as of 2013.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — other uses between Least developed countries and Morocco?
78,810 t, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Morocco?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least developed countries and Morocco rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — other uses?
Least developed countries ranks 16th and Morocco ranks 9th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Morocco: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-other-uses-non-food/least-developed-countries/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-other-uses-non-food/least-developed-countries/morocco/">Least developed countries vs Morocco: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
167 places, 7,797 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.