Belgium vs Poland: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses over time
- Belgium
- Poland
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 10,238 t against 8,763 t in Poland, a difference of 1,475 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 45th and Poland ranks 48th of 128 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22,403 t | 6,082 t | 16,321 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 11,691 t | 9,096 t | 2,595 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — other uses, Belgium or Poland?
- Belgium, at 10,238 t against 8,763 t in Poland as of 2013.
- What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — other uses between Belgium and Poland?
- 1,475 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Belgium and Poland rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — other uses?
- Belgium ranks 45th and Poland ranks 48th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.