Australia and New Zealand vs USSR: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity

Australia and New Zealand
186,812 t
in 2013
USSR
777,409 t
in 1991
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd
USSR rank
2nd

Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • USSR
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119872013

How they compare

USSR currently reports 777,409 t against 186,812 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 590,597 t.

That makes USSR's figure about 4.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was USSR ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 2nd of 130 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and USSR in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand USSR Difference Ahead
1960s 404,193 t 631,044 t 226,852 t USSR
1970s 419,249 t 810,281 t 391,032 t USSR
1980s 501,657 t 846,085 t 344,428 t USSR
1990s 836,697 t 794,640 t 42,058 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity, Australia and New Zealand or USSR?
USSR, at 777,409 t against 186,812 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 1991.
What is the difference in wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity between Australia and New Zealand and USSR?
590,597 t, with USSR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and USSR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Australia and New Zealand and USSR rank globally for wool (clean eq.) — domestic supply quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and USSR ranks 2nd of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs USSR: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-domestic-supply-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/ussr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wool-clean-eq-domestic-supply-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/ussr/">Australia and New Zealand vs USSR: Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool (Clean Eq.) — Domestic supply quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 7,903 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.