Belarus vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Wheat and products — Losses

Belarus
111 1000 t
in 2023
Small island developing States (SIDS)
34 1000 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
28th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
8th

Wheat and products — Losses over time

  • Belarus
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
255075100125150201020162023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 111 1000 t against 34 1000 t in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 77 1000 t.

That makes Belarus's figure about 3.3 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 28th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th of 130 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2010s 110.5 1000 t 56.8 1000 t 53.7 1000 t Belarus
2020s 122 1000 t 42.75 1000 t 79.25 1000 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat and products — losses, Belarus or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Belarus, at 111 1000 t against 34 1000 t in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat and products — losses between Belarus and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
77 1000 t, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for wheat and products — losses?
Belarus ranks 28th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 8th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat and products — Losses. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Wheat and products — Losses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-and-products-losses/belarus/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-and-products-losses/belarus/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Belarus vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Wheat and products — Losses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat and products — Losses
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
174 places, 2,385 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.