Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Vegetables β€” Processing

Belarus
41 1000 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
151 1000 t
in 2023
Belarus rank
13th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th

Vegetables β€” Processing over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
050100150201020162023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 151 1000 t against 41 1000 t in Belarus, a difference of 110 1000 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.7 times Belarus's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 41 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 32.3 1000 t 67.9 1000 t 35.6 1000 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 36.5 1000 t 98 1000 t 61.5 1000 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables β€” processing, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 151 1000 t against 41 1000 t in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables β€” processing between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
110 1000 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for vegetables β€” processing?
Belarus ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Vegetables β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Vegetables β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-processing/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-processing/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Vegetables β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables β€” Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 879 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.