Congo, Republic of vs Ecuador: Vegetables and their products — Magnesium supply — Value

Congo, Republic of
10 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Ecuador
8 mg/cap/d
in 2023
Congo, Republic of rank
158th
Ecuador rank
161st

Vegetables and their products — Magnesium supply — Value over time

  • Congo, Republic of
  • Ecuador
102030201020162023

How they compare

Congo, Republic of currently reports 10 mg/cap/d against 8 mg/cap/d in Ecuador, a difference of 2 mg/cap/d.

That makes Congo, Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Congo, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Congo, Republic of ranks 158th and Ecuador ranks 161st of 163 countries.

Congo, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Republic of Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 29.8 mg/cap/d 8.4 mg/cap/d 21.4 mg/cap/d Congo, Republic of
2020s 10.75 mg/cap/d 8.5 mg/cap/d 2.25 mg/cap/d Congo, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and their products — magnesium supply — value, Congo, Republic of or Ecuador?
Congo, Republic of, at 10 mg/cap/d against 8 mg/cap/d in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and their products — magnesium supply — value between Congo, Republic of and Ecuador?
2 mg/cap/d, with Congo, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Ecuador?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Congo, Republic of and Ecuador rank globally for vegetables and their products — magnesium supply — value?
Congo, Republic of ranks 158th and Ecuador ranks 161st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Vegetables and their products — Magnesium supply — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Republic of vs Ecuador: Vegetables and their products — Magnesium supply — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-their-products-magnesium-supply-value/congo-rep/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-their-products-magnesium-supply-value/congo-rep/ecuador/">Congo, Republic of vs Ecuador: Vegetables and their products — Magnesium supply — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and their products — Magnesium supply — Value
Unit
mg/cap/d
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
179 places, 2,425 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The dataset presents average daily per capita macro and micro nutrient availability by country and by FAO/WHO GIFT food groups (that are different from those used for the Food Balance Sheets), expressed in grams/milligrams/micrograms/kcal per capita per day. The population numbers used to calculate these statistics can be found in the Supply Utilization Accounts (SUA) dataset of FAOSTAT, as Total Population. Food availability quantities are derived from the SUA dataset. SUAs present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply and utilization during a specified reference period. The SUA shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per capita supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it.