Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value

Chile
2,185 1000 Int$
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
7,786 1000 Int$
in 2024
Chile rank
6th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
7th

True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value over time

  • Chile
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 7,786 1000 Int$ against 2,185 1000 Int$ in Chile, a difference of 5,601 1000 Int$.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.6 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 24 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 1,906 1000 Int$ 1,330 1000 Int$ 576.22 1000 Int$ Chile
1970s 1,771 1000 Int$ 1,297 1000 Int$ 473.4 1000 Int$ Chile
1980s 1,901 1000 Int$ 2,849 1000 Int$ 948.2 1000 Int$ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 2,006 1000 Int$ 5,508 1000 Int$ 3,502 1000 Int$ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2,152 1000 Int$ 6,535 1000 Int$ 4,384 1000 Int$ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2,157 1000 Int$ 7,256 1000 Int$ 5,098 1000 Int$ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2,186 1000 Int$ 7,764 1000 Int$ 5,577 1000 Int$ Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value, Chile or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 7,786 1000 Int$ against 2,185 1000 Int$ in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value between Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
5,601 1000 Int$, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value?
Chile ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 24 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/true-hemp-raw-or-retted-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/chile/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/true-hemp-raw-or-retted-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i/chile/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Chile vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
40 places, 1,835 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.