True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in Chile
Chile: True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value was 2,185 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
2,185 1000 Int$
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 24 countries
All-time high
2,200 1000 Int$
in 2005
All-time low
1,505 1000 Int$
in 1973
Years of data
64
1961–2024
True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in Chile, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in Chile is 2,185 1000 Int$, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in Chile peaked at 2,200 1000 Int$ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 1,505 1000 Int$, in 1973.
That places Chile 6th out of 24 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value in Chile, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 1,806 1000 Int$ | -5.2% |
| 1971 | 1,806 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1,756 1000 Int$ | -2.8% |
| 1973 | 1,505 1000 Int$ | -14.3% |
| 1974 | 1,605 1000 Int$ | +6.6% |
| 1975 | 1,806 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1976 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 1977 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 1978 | 1,756 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 1979 | 1,756 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 1,806 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1981 | 1,806 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 1,806 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 1,856 1000 Int$ | +2.8% |
| 1984 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 1,906 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +5.2% |
| 1988 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2,006 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2,030 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 2,054 1000 Int$ | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 2,097 1000 Int$ | +2.1% |
| 2003 | 2,152 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 2004 | 2,182 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2,200 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2,175 1000 Int$ | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 2,132 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 2014 | 2,088 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 2,125 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
| 2016 | 2,143 1000 Int$ | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 2,156 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 2,170 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 2,184 1000 Int$ | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 2,196 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 2,182 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2022 | 2,183 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2,185 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 2,185 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,906 1000 Int$ | 1,906 1000 Int$ | 1,906 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 1,771 1000 Int$ | 1,505 1000 Int$ | 2,006 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 1,901 1000 Int$ | 1,806 1000 Int$ | 2,006 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2,006 1000 Int$ | 2,006 1000 Int$ | 2,006 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2,152 1000 Int$ | 2,030 1000 Int$ | 2,200 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,157 1000 Int$ | 2,088 1000 Int$ | 2,200 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,186 1000 Int$ | 2,182 1000 Int$ | 2,196 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3.45 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3.45 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in Chile?
- True hemp, raw or retted — gross production value in Chile was 2,185 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 2,200 1000 Int$ in 2005.
- What is the lowest true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 1,505 1000 Int$ in 1973.
- How does Chile rank for true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value?
- Chile ranks 6th out of 24 countries with data for 2024.
- Is true hemp, raw or retted — gross production value rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of True hemp, raw or retted — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.