Nigeria vs Viet Nam: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- Nigeria
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 118,343 hectares against 118,263 hectares in Nigeria, a difference of 80 hectares.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 30th of 190 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24,504 hectares | 80,140 hectares | 55,635 hectares | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 72,460 hectares | 213,639 hectares | 141,179 hectares | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 101,959 hectares | 158,003 hectares | 56,044 hectares | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, Nigeria or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 118,343 hectares against 118,263 hectares in Nigeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between Nigeria and Viet Nam?
- 80 hectares, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Viet Nam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Nigeria and Viet Nam rank globally for tree cover loss?
- Nigeria ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 30th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.