Which has higher tree cover loss, Nepal or Slovenia?

Slovenia, at 3,331 hectares against 2,964 hectares in Nepal as of 2025.

What is the difference in tree cover loss between Nepal and Slovenia?

367 hectares, with Slovenia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Slovenia?

25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nepal vs Slovenia: Tree Cover Loss

Nepal

2,964 hectares

in 2025

Slovenia

3,331 hectares

in 2025

Nepal rank

110th

Slovenia rank

109th

Tree Cover Loss over time

Nepal
Slovenia

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 3,331 hectares against 2,964 hectares in Nepal, a difference of 367 hectares.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 110th and Slovenia ranks 109th of 190 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nepal	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2,935 hectares	1,358 hectares	1,577 hectares	Nepal
2010s	1,994 hectares	3,274 hectares	1,281 hectares	Slovenia
2020s	2,488 hectares	3,441 hectares	953 hectares	Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Nepal or Slovenia?: Slovenia, at 3,331 hectares against 2,964 hectares in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Nepal and Slovenia?: 367 hectares, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Slovenia?: 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Slovenia rank globally for tree cover loss?: Nepal ranks 110th and Slovenia ranks 109th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Slovenia: Tree Cover Loss. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/nepal/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-hectares/nepal/slovenia/">Nepal vs Slovenia: Tree Cover Loss</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.