India vs Nigeria: Tree Cover Loss
Tree Cover Loss over time
- India
- Nigeria
How they compare
India currently reports 118,595 hectares against 118,263 hectares in Nigeria, a difference of 332 hectares.
Across all 25 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
India ranks 29th and Nigeria ranks 31st of 190 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61,426 hectares | 24,504 hectares | 36,921 hectares | India |
| 2010s | 112,064 hectares | 72,460 hectares | 39,604 hectares | India |
| 2020s | 125,364 hectares | 101,959 hectares | 23,405 hectares | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss, India or Nigeria?
- India, at 118,595 hectares against 118,263 hectares in Nigeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss between India and Nigeria?
- 332 hectares, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Nigeria?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do India and Nigeria rank globally for tree cover loss?
- India ranks 29th and Nigeria ranks 31st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.