Botswana vs Kuwait: Tree Cover Loss

Botswana
1 hectares
in 2025
Kuwait
0 hectares
in 2025
Botswana rank
165th
Kuwait rank
167th

Tree Cover Loss over time

  • Botswana
  • Kuwait
050100150200120132025

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1 hectares against 0 hectares in Kuwait, a difference of 1 hectares.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 165th and Kuwait ranks 167th of 189 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Kuwait Difference Ahead
2000s 44.89 hectares 0 hectares 44.89 hectares Botswana
2010s 10.2 hectares 0 hectares 10.2 hectares Botswana
2020s 1.5 hectares 0 hectares 1.5 hectares Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss, Botswana or Kuwait?
Botswana, at 1 hectares against 0 hectares in Kuwait as of 2025.
What is the difference in tree cover loss between Botswana and Kuwait?
1 hectares, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kuwait?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Kuwait rank globally for tree cover loss?
Botswana ranks 165th and Kuwait ranks 167th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA), published as Tree Cover Loss (hectares). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Tree Cover Loss (hectares)
Unit
hectares
Source
Global Forest Watch. Tree Cover Loss (Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 4,725 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

Shows year-by-year tree cover loss, defined as stand level replacement of vegetation greater than 5 meters, within the selected area. The tree cover loss data set is a collaboration of the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, and uses Landsat satellite images to map annual tree cover loss at a 30 × 30 meter resolution. Note that “tree cover loss” is not the same as “deforestation” – tree cover loss includes change in both natural and planted forest, and does not need to be human caused. The data from 2011 onward were produced with an updated methodology that may capture additional loss. Comparisons between the original 2001-2010 data and future years should be performed with caution.