Oceania vs Sudan: Tomatoes — Area harvested
Tomatoes — Area harvested over time
- Oceania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 47,362 ha against 6,287 ha in Oceania, a difference of 41,075 ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 7.5 times Oceania's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Oceania ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 29th of 30 groups.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6,469 ha | 43,714 ha | 37,245 ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 5,876 ha | 47,358 ha | 41,483 ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tomatoes — area harvested, Oceania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 47,362 ha against 6,287 ha in Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tomatoes — area harvested between Oceania and Sudan?
- 41,075 ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Oceania and Sudan rank globally for tomatoes — area harvested?
- Oceania ranks 29th and Sudan ranks 29th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tomatoes — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.