Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Malaysia: Tobacco — Stock Variation

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
0 t
in 2013
Malaysia
0 t
in 2013
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
2nd
Malaysia rank
16th

Tobacco — Stock Variation over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Malaysia
-400-2000200400600196119872013

How they compare

Democratic People's Republic of Korea currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Malaysia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and Malaysia ranks 16th of 9 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1970s 0 t 0 t 0 t
1980s 90.91 t 0 t 90.91 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
1990s -90.91 t 0 t 90.91 t Malaysia
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — stock variation, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Malaysia?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea, at 0 t against 0 t in Malaysia as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — stock variation between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Malaysia?
0 t, with Democratic People's Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Malaysia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Malaysia rank globally for tobacco — stock variation?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and Malaysia ranks 16th of 9 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Malaysia: Tobacco — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-stock-variation/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-stock-variation/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/malaysia/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Malaysia: Tobacco — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 6,001 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.