Congo vs Montenegro: Tobacco — Production
Tobacco — Production over time
- Congo
- Montenegro
How they compare
Congo currently reports 450 t against 230 t in Montenegro, a difference of 220 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 2.0 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Congo ranks 96th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 121 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 379.5 t | 346.25 t | 33.25 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 440 t | 246 t | 194 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tobacco — production, Congo or Montenegro?
- Congo, at 450 t against 230 t in Montenegro as of 2013.
- What is the difference in tobacco — production between Congo and Montenegro?
- 220 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2013.
- How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for tobacco — production?
- Congo ranks 96th and Montenegro ranks 98th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.