Netherlands Antilles (former) vs Uganda: Tobacco — Import Quantity

Netherlands Antilles (former)
1,017 t
in 2010
Uganda
1,133 t
in 2013
Netherlands Antilles (former) rank
132nd
Uganda rank
130th

Tobacco — Import Quantity over time

  • Netherlands Antilles (former)
  • Uganda
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 1,133 t against 1,017 t in Netherlands Antilles (former), a difference of 116 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands Antilles (former)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Netherlands Antilles (former) ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 130th of 171 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Netherlands Antilles (former) averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Antilles (former) Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 110.56 t 717.34 t 606.79 t Uganda
1970s 319.3 t 61.31 t 257.99 t Netherlands Antilles (former)
1980s 402.87 t 0 t 402.87 t Netherlands Antilles (former)
1990s 265.25 t 46.18 t 219.06 t Netherlands Antilles (former)
2000s 1,034 t 1,328 t 294.78 t Uganda
2010s 1,017 t 2,248 t 1,232 t Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tobacco — import quantity, Netherlands Antilles (former) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 1,133 t against 1,017 t in Netherlands Antilles (former) as of 2013.
What is the difference in tobacco — import quantity between Netherlands Antilles (former) and Uganda?
116 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands Antilles (former) and Uganda?
50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2010.
How do Netherlands Antilles (former) and Uganda rank globally for tobacco — import quantity?
Netherlands Antilles (former) ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 130th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Tobacco — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands Antilles (former) vs Uganda: Tobacco — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-import-quantity/netherlands-antilles-former/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/tobacco-import-quantity/netherlands-antilles-former/uganda/">Netherlands Antilles (former) vs Uganda: Tobacco — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tobacco — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
215 places, 10,338 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.