Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Türkiye: Sweeteners, Other — Other uses

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
69 1000 t
in 2023
Türkiye
261 1000 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
5th
Türkiye rank
2nd

Sweeteners, Other — Other uses over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Türkiye
50100150200250300201020162023

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 261 1000 t against 69 1000 t in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 192 1000 t.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 3.8 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 14 groups.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Türkiye Difference Ahead
2010s 93.1 1000 t 226.3 1000 t 133.2 1000 t Türkiye
2020s 72.5 1000 t 245.5 1000 t 173 1000 t Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sweeteners, other — other uses, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 261 1000 t against 69 1000 t in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in sweeteners, other — other uses between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Türkiye?
192 1000 t, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Türkiye?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Türkiye rank globally for sweeteners, other — other uses?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sweeteners, Other — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Türkiye: Sweeteners, Other — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sweeteners-other-other-uses-non-food/least-developed-countries-ldcs/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sweeteners-other-other-uses-non-food/least-developed-countries-ldcs/turkiye-2/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Türkiye: Sweeteners, Other — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sweeteners, Other — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
147 places, 1,874 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.