Mongolia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Processing

Mongolia
58 1000 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
48 1000 t
in 2023
Mongolia rank
30th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Processing over time

  • Mongolia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0204060201020162023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 58 1000 t against 48 1000 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 10 1000 t.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 90 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 18.75 1000 t 0 1000 t 18.75 1000 t Mongolia
2020s 52 1000 t 29.5 1000 t 22.5 1000 t Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar (raw equivalent) — processing, Mongolia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Mongolia, at 58 1000 t against 48 1000 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar (raw equivalent) — processing between Mongolia and United Republic of Tanzania?
10 1000 t, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United Republic of Tanzania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for sugar (raw equivalent) — processing?
Mongolia ranks 30th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 90 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-raw-equivalent-processing/mongolia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-raw-equivalent-processing/mongolia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Mongolia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Processing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
131 places, 1,773 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.