Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Viet Nam: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Processing

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
113 1000 t
in 2023
Viet Nam
135 1000 t
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
21st
Viet Nam rank
18th

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Processing over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Viet Nam
050100150200201020162023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 135 1000 t against 113 1000 t in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 22 1000 t.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 21st and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 100 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iran (Islamic Republic of) averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2010s 80.8 1000 t 20.3 1000 t 60.5 1000 t Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2020s 116.75 1000 t 158.25 1000 t 41.5 1000 t Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar (raw equivalent) β€” processing, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 135 1000 t against 113 1000 t in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar (raw equivalent) β€” processing between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Viet Nam?
22 1000 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Viet Nam?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Viet Nam rank globally for sugar (raw equivalent) β€” processing?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 21st and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Viet Nam: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-raw-equivalent-processing/iran-islamic-republic-of/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-raw-equivalent-processing/iran-islamic-republic-of/viet-nam-2/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Viet Nam: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) β€” Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
131 places, 1,773 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.