China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Import quantity

China, Hong Kong SAR
191 1000 t
in 2023
Georgia
163 1000 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
65th
Georgia rank
68th

Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Import quantity over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Georgia
0100200300201020162023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 191 1000 t against 163 1000 t in Georgia, a difference of 28 1000 t.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 65th and Georgia ranks 68th of 164 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Georgia Difference Ahead
2010s 245.7 1000 t 161.4 1000 t 84.3 1000 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 196.75 1000 t 157 1000 t 39.75 1000 t China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar (raw equivalent) — import quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Georgia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 191 1000 t against 163 1000 t in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar (raw equivalent) — import quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia?
28 1000 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia rank globally for sugar (raw equivalent) — import quantity?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 65th and Georgia ranks 68th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-raw-equivalent-import-quantity/china-hong-kong-sar/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-raw-equivalent-import-quantity/china-hong-kong-sar/georgia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar (Raw Equivalent) — Import quantity
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,901 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.