Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lithuania: Sugar Crops β€” Processing

Democratic Republic of the Congo
1,130 1000 t
in 2023
Lithuania
1,089 1000 t
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
67th
Lithuania rank
69th

Sugar Crops β€” Processing over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Lithuania
5007501.0k1.2k1.5k1.8k201020162023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 1,130 1000 t against 1,089 1000 t in Lithuania, a difference of 41 1000 t.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 67th and Lithuania ranks 69th of 128 regions.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Lithuania Difference Ahead
2010s 1,226 1000 t 845.8 1000 t 380.2 1000 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 1,310 1000 t 904 1000 t 405.75 1000 t Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops β€” processing, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Lithuania?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 1,130 1000 t against 1,089 1000 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops β€” processing between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lithuania?
41 1000 t, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lithuania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Lithuania rank globally for sugar crops β€” processing?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 67th and Lithuania ranks 69th of 128 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar Crops β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lithuania: Sugar Crops β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-processing/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-processing/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/lithuania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Lithuania: Sugar Crops β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops β€” Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
159 places, 2,157 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.