Australia and New Zealand vs Gabon: Sugar Crops — Food supply

Australia and New Zealand
6,941 million Kcal
in 2023
Gabon
2,324 million Kcal
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
38th
Gabon rank
39th

Sugar Crops — Food supply over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Gabon
02.0k4.0k6.0k201020162023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 6,941 million Kcal against 2,324 million Kcal in Gabon, a difference of 4,617 million Kcal.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 3.0 times Gabon's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Gabon ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 38th and Gabon ranks 39th of 104 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Gabon Difference Ahead
2010s 272.87 million Kcal 1,788 million Kcal 1,515 million Kcal Gabon
2020s 2,140 million Kcal 2,141 million Kcal 0.96 million Kcal Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar crops — food supply, Australia and New Zealand or Gabon?
Australia and New Zealand, at 6,941 million Kcal against 2,324 million Kcal in Gabon as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar crops — food supply between Australia and New Zealand and Gabon?
4,617 million Kcal, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Gabon?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Gabon rank globally for sugar crops — food supply?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 38th and Gabon ranks 39th of 104 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar Crops — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Gabon: Sugar Crops — Food supply. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-food-supply-kcal/australia-and-new-zealand/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-crops-food-supply-kcal/australia-and-new-zealand/gabon/">Australia and New Zealand vs Gabon: Sugar Crops — Food supply</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar Crops — Food supply (kcal)
Unit
million Kcal
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
132 places, 1,646 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.