Northern Africa vs Peru: Sugar cane — Processing
Sugar cane — Processing over time
- Northern Africa
- Peru
How they compare
Northern Africa currently reports 14,335 1000 t against 9,421 1000 t in Peru, a difference of 4,914 1000 t.
That makes Northern Africa's figure about 1.5 times Peru's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Northern Africa has been ahead every year.
Northern Africa ranks 21st and Peru ranks 19th of 27 groups.
Northern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15,548 1000 t | 9,653 1000 t | 5,895 1000 t | Northern Africa |
| 2020s | 14,765 1000 t | 9,347 1000 t | 5,418 1000 t | Northern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — processing, Northern Africa or Peru?
- Northern Africa, at 14,335 1000 t against 9,421 1000 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — processing between Northern Africa and Peru?
- 4,914 1000 t, with Northern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Peru?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Northern Africa and Peru rank globally for sugar cane — processing?
- Northern Africa ranks 21st and Peru ranks 19th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.