El Salvador vs Myanmar: Sugar cane — Processing
Sugar cane — Processing over time
- El Salvador
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 8,857 1000 t against 6,564 1000 t in El Salvador, a difference of 2,293 1000 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.3 times El Salvador's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 20th of 86 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6,361 1000 t | 8,295 1000 t | 1,934 1000 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 6,787 1000 t | 8,902 1000 t | 2,116 1000 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — processing, El Salvador or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 8,857 1000 t against 6,564 1000 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — processing between El Salvador and Myanmar?
- 2,293 1000 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Myanmar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Myanmar rank globally for sugar cane — processing?
- El Salvador ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 20th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.