Costa Rica vs Malawi: Sugar cane — Processing
Sugar cane — Processing over time
- Costa Rica
- Malawi
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 2,979 1000 t against 2,078 1000 t in Malawi, a difference of 901 1000 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.4 times Malawi's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 36th and Malawi ranks 39th of 86 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4,025 1000 t | 2,570 1000 t | 1,455 1000 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 3,470 1000 t | 2,383 1000 t | 1,086 1000 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — processing, Costa Rica or Malawi?
- Costa Rica, at 2,979 1000 t against 2,078 1000 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — processing between Costa Rica and Malawi?
- 901 1000 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malawi?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Malawi rank globally for sugar cane — processing?
- Costa Rica ranks 36th and Malawi ranks 39th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.