Argentina vs Indonesia: Sugar cane — Processing
Sugar cane — Processing over time
- Argentina
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 27,695 1000 t against 14,931 1000 t in Argentina, a difference of 12,764 1000 t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.9 times Argentina's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 14th and Indonesia ranks 11th of 86 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19,118 1000 t | 25,998 1000 t | 6,880 1000 t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 16,100 1000 t | 27,931 1000 t | 11,830 1000 t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — processing, Argentina or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 27,695 1000 t against 14,931 1000 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — processing between Argentina and Indonesia?
- 12,764 1000 t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Indonesia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Indonesia rank globally for sugar cane — processing?
- Argentina ranks 14th and Indonesia ranks 11th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar cane — Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.