Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Sugar beet β€” Processing

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
610 1000 t
in 2023
Spain
2,358 1000 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
20th
Spain rank
17th

Sugar beet β€” Processing over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Spain
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k201020162023

How they compare

Spain currently reports 2,358 1000 t against 610 1000 t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 1,748 1000 t.

That makes Spain's figure about 3.9 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th and Spain ranks 17th of 23 groups.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Spain Difference Ahead
2010s 864.6 1000 t 3,174 1000 t 2,309 1000 t Spain
2020s 587 1000 t 1,996 1000 t 1,408 1000 t Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar beet β€” processing, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Spain?
Spain, at 2,358 1000 t against 610 1000 t in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar beet β€” processing between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain?
1,748 1000 t, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain rank globally for sugar beet β€” processing?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 20th and Spain ranks 17th of 23 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sugar beet β€” Processing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Sugar beet β€” Processing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-beet-processing/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-beet-processing/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/spain/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Sugar beet β€” Processing</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar beet β€” Processing
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
73 places, 985 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.