Congo vs Malta: Stimulants — Food supply
Stimulants — Food supply over time
- Congo
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 20,195 million Kcal against 18,557 million Kcal in Congo, a difference of 1,638 million Kcal.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malta ahead.
Congo ranks 113th and Malta ranks 111th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10,830 million Kcal | 14,835 million Kcal | 4,004 million Kcal | Malta |
| 2020s | 22,230 million Kcal | 18,529 million Kcal | 3,701 million Kcal | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher stimulants — food supply, Congo or Malta?
- Malta, at 20,195 million Kcal against 18,557 million Kcal in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in stimulants — food supply between Congo and Malta?
- 1,638 million Kcal, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malta?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Malta rank globally for stimulants — food supply?
- Congo ranks 113th and Malta ranks 111th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Stimulants — Food supply (kcal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.