Belgium-Luxembourg vs Least developed countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Production

Belgium-Luxembourg
15,100 t
in 1999
Least developed countries
2,400 t
in 2013
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
10th
Least developed countries rank
15th

Soft-Fibres, Other — Production over time

  • Belgium-Luxembourg
  • Least developed countries
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119872013

How they compare

Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 15,100 t against 2,400 t in Least developed countries, a difference of 12,700 t.

That makes Belgium-Luxembourg's figure about 6.3 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 10th and Least developed countries ranks 15th of 45 countries.

Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium-Luxembourg Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1960s 29,568 t 285.33 t 29,283 t Belgium-Luxembourg
1970s 10,159 t 325 t 9,834 t Belgium-Luxembourg
1980s 10,047 t 657 t 9,390 t Belgium-Luxembourg
1990s 11,947 t 1,300 t 10,647 t Belgium-Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — production, Belgium-Luxembourg or Least developed countries?
Belgium-Luxembourg, at 15,100 t against 2,400 t in Least developed countries as of 1999.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — production between Belgium-Luxembourg and Least developed countries?
12,700 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Least developed countries?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Least developed countries rank globally for soft-fibres, other — production?
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 10th and Least developed countries ranks 15th of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium-Luxembourg vs Least developed countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-production/belgium-luxembourg/least-developed-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-production/belgium-luxembourg/least-developed-countries/">Belgium-Luxembourg vs Least developed countries: Soft-Fibres, Other — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
67 places, 3,113 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.