Argentina vs Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Production

Argentina
2,700 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries
2,400 t
in 2013
Argentina rank
16th
Land locked developing countries rank
8th

Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Production over time

  • Argentina
  • Land locked developing countries
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119872013

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 2,700 t against 2,400 t in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 300 t.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Land locked developing countries's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 16th and Land locked developing countries ranks 8th of 45 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Land locked developing countries Difference Ahead
1960s 2,066 t 285.33 t 1,780 t Argentina
1970s 1,663 t 325 t 1,338 t Argentina
1980s 1,407 t 657 t 750 t Argentina
1990s 1,907 t 1,300 t 607.3 t Argentina
2000s 1,973 t 1,711 t 261.9 t Argentina
2010s 2,410 t 2,271 t 138.25 t Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other β€” production, Argentina or Land locked developing countries?
Argentina, at 2,700 t against 2,400 t in Land locked developing countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other β€” production between Argentina and Land locked developing countries?
300 t, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Land locked developing countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Argentina and Land locked developing countries rank globally for soft-fibres, other β€” production?
Argentina ranks 16th and Land locked developing countries ranks 8th of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-production/argentina/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-production/argentina/land-locked-developing-countries/">Argentina vs Land locked developing countries: Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Production</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
67 places, 3,113 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.