Philippines vs Saudi Arabia: Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Import Quantity

Philippines
90 t
in 2013
Saudi Arabia
122 t
in 2013
Philippines rank
42nd
Saudi Arabia rank
41st

Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Import Quantity over time

  • Philippines
  • Saudi Arabia
05001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 122 t against 90 t in Philippines, a difference of 32 t.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.4 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Philippines ranks 42nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 41st of 137 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”
1970s 0.1 t 108.9 t 108.8 t Saudi Arabia
1980s 159.9 t 134.8 t 25.1 t Philippines
1990s 3.5 t 149.1 t 145.6 t Saudi Arabia
2000s 162 t 434.5 t 272.5 t Saudi Arabia
2010s 58 t 30.5 t 27.5 t Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other β€” import quantity, Philippines or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 122 t against 90 t in Philippines as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other β€” import quantity between Philippines and Saudi Arabia?
32 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Saudi Arabia?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Philippines and Saudi Arabia rank globally for soft-fibres, other β€” import quantity?
Philippines ranks 42nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 41st of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Saudi Arabia: Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-import-quantity/philippines/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-import-quantity/philippines/saudi-arabia/">Philippines vs Saudi Arabia: Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Import Quantity</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other β€” Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
176 places, 8,414 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.