Least developed countries vs Slovenia: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity

Least developed countries
108 t
in 2013
Slovenia
764 t
in 2013
Least developed countries rank
22nd
Slovenia rank
23rd

Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Slovenia
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119872013

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 764 t against 108 t in Least developed countries, a difference of 656 t.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 7.1 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 22nd and Slovenia ranks 23rd of 28 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 508 t 225.12 t 282.88 t Least developed countries
2000s 751.3 t 626.1 t 125.2 t Least developed countries
2010s 118.25 t 729.75 t 611.5 t Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — import quantity, Least developed countries or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 764 t against 108 t in Least developed countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — import quantity between Least developed countries and Slovenia?
656 t, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Slovenia?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Least developed countries and Slovenia rank globally for soft-fibres, other — import quantity?
Least developed countries ranks 22nd and Slovenia ranks 23rd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Slovenia: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-import-quantity/least-developed-countries/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-import-quantity/least-developed-countries/slovenia/">Least developed countries vs Slovenia: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
176 places, 8,414 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.