France vs Lithuania: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity over time
- France
- Lithuania
How they compare
France currently reports 18,064 t against 9,834 t in Lithuania, a difference of 8,230 t.
That makes France's figure about 1.8 times Lithuania's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
France ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 145 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 25,821 t | 6,977 t | 18,843 t | France |
| 2000s | 32,302 t | 15,048 t | 17,254 t | France |
| 2010s | 21,514 t | 9,934 t | 11,580 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soft-fibres, other — import quantity, France or Lithuania?
- France, at 18,064 t against 9,834 t in Lithuania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — import quantity between France and Lithuania?
- 8,230 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Lithuania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
- How do France and Lithuania rank globally for soft-fibres, other — import quantity?
- France ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 145 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.