Australia vs United Arab Emirates: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity

Australia
258 t
in 2013
United Arab Emirates
195 t
in 2013
Australia rank
32nd
United Arab Emirates rank
35th

Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity over time

  • Australia
  • United Arab Emirates
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119872013

How they compare

Australia currently reports 258 t against 195 t in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 63 t.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times United Arab Emirates's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 32nd and United Arab Emirates ranks 35th of 137 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1960s 2,601 t 0 t 2,601 t Australia
1970s 1,751 t 2.5 t 1,749 t Australia
1980s 19 t 1.7 t 17.3 t Australia
1990s 162.2 t 0 t 162.2 t Australia
2000s 17 t 78.5 t 61.5 t United Arab Emirates
2010s 109.75 t 181.5 t 71.75 t United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher soft-fibres, other — import quantity, Australia or United Arab Emirates?
Australia, at 258 t against 195 t in United Arab Emirates as of 2013.
What is the difference in soft-fibres, other — import quantity between Australia and United Arab Emirates?
63 t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Arab Emirates?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for soft-fibres, other — import quantity?
Australia ranks 32nd and United Arab Emirates ranks 35th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United Arab Emirates: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-import-quantity/australia/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/soft-fibres-other-import-quantity/australia/united-arab-emirates/">Australia vs United Arab Emirates: Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Soft-Fibres, Other — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
176 places, 8,414 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.