Australia and New Zealand vs Land locked developing countries: Sisal — Import Quantity

Australia and New Zealand
0 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries
6 t
in 2013
Australia and New Zealand rank
17th
Land locked developing countries rank
4th

Sisal — Import Quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land locked developing countries
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119872013

How they compare

Land locked developing countries currently reports 6 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 6 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th and Land locked developing countries ranks 4th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Land locked developing countries in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land locked developing countries Difference Ahead
1960s 24,048 t 162.22 t 23,886 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 14,408 t 102.8 t 14,305 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 3,809 t 8.2 t 3,801 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 1,792 t 85.5 t 1,707 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 267.8 t 292.6 t 24.8 t Land locked developing countries
2010s 0 t 7 t 7 t Land locked developing countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sisal — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Land locked developing countries?
Land locked developing countries, at 6 t against 0 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in sisal — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Land locked developing countries?
6 t, with Land locked developing countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land locked developing countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land locked developing countries rank globally for sisal — import quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 17th and Land locked developing countries ranks 4th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land locked developing countries: Sisal — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/sisal-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land locked developing countries: Sisal — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sisal — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
159 places, 7,905 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.