Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Romania: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
3,605 1000 Int$
in 2024
Romania
60,145 1000 Int$
in 2017
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
5th
Romania rank
6th

Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Romania
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922024

How they compare

Romania currently reports 60,145 1000 Int$ against 3,605 1000 Int$ in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 56,540 1000 Int$.

That makes Romania's figure about 16.7 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th and Romania ranks 6th of 7 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 3,696 1000 Int$ 4,053 1000 Int$ 356.44 1000 Int$ Romania
1970s 3,977 1000 Int$ 3,394 1000 Int$ 583.1 1000 Int$ Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 3,089 1000 Int$ 3,909 1000 Int$ 820.1 1000 Int$ Romania
1990s 3,233 1000 Int$ 3,976 1000 Int$ 742.62 1000 Int$ Romania
2000s 3,730 1000 Int$ 37,920 1000 Int$ 34,191 1000 Int$ Romania
2010s 3,829 1000 Int$ 60,145 1000 Int$ 56,316 1000 Int$ Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Romania?
Romania, at 60,145 1000 Int$ against 3,605 1000 Int$ in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2017.
What is the difference in silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Romania?
56,540 1000 Int$, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Romania?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Romania rank globally for silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — gross production value?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 5th and Romania ranks 6th of 7 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Romania: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-worm-cocoons-suitable-for-reeling-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/romania/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Romania: Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk-worm cocoons suitable for reeling — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)
Unit
1000 Int$
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
57 places, 2,891 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.