Land locked developing countries vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Silk — Stock Variation

Land locked developing countries
0 t
in 2013
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries rank
1st
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
2nd

Silk — Stock Variation over time

  • Land locked developing countries
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
-50050100196119872013

How they compare

Land locked developing countries currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Land locked developing countries ranks 1st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 2nd of 3 regions.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land locked developing countries Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1990s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2000s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk — stock variation, Land locked developing countries or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Land locked developing countries, at 0 t against 0 t in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk — stock variation between Land locked developing countries and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
0 t, with Land locked developing countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Land locked developing countries and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for silk — stock variation?
Land locked developing countries ranks 1st and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 2nd of 3 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk — Stock Variation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land locked developing countries vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Silk — Stock Variation. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Land locked developing countries vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Silk — Stock Variation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Stock Variation
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
37 places, 1,767 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.