Least developed countries vs Thailand: Silk — Other uses

Least developed countries
1,390 t
in 2013
Thailand
6,420 t
in 2013
Least developed countries rank
13th
Thailand rank
4th

Silk — Other uses over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Thailand
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119872013

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 6,420 t against 1,390 t in Least developed countries, a difference of 5,030 t.

That makes Thailand's figure about 4.6 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 13th and Thailand ranks 4th of 28 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 1,058 t 190.11 t 867.44 t Least developed countries
1970s 1,006 t 410.3 t 596 t Least developed countries
1980s 805.9 t 1,471 t 664.9 t Thailand
1990s 1,948 t 7,050 t 5,102 t Thailand
2000s 1,563 t 7,063 t 5,500 t Thailand
2010s 1,413 t 6,442 t 5,029 t Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk — other uses, Least developed countries or Thailand?
Thailand, at 6,420 t against 1,390 t in Least developed countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk — other uses between Least developed countries and Thailand?
5,030 t, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Thailand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Least developed countries and Thailand rank globally for silk — other uses?
Least developed countries ranks 13th and Thailand ranks 4th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Thailand: Silk — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-other-uses-non-food/least-developed-countries/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-other-uses-non-food/least-developed-countries/thailand/">Least developed countries vs Thailand: Silk — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 6,574 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.