Afghanistan vs Small island developing States: Silk — Other uses

Afghanistan
750 t
in 2013
Small island developing States
3 t
in 2013
Afghanistan rank
12th
Small island developing States rank
25th

Silk — Other uses over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Small island developing States
02505007501.0k196119872013

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 750 t against 3 t in Small island developing States, a difference of 747 t.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 250.0 times Small island developing States's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan ranks 12th and Small island developing States ranks 25th of 99 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Small island developing States Difference Ahead
1960s 543.89 t 0 t 543.89 t Afghanistan
1970s 578 t 4.1 t 573.9 t Afghanistan
1980s 550 t 2.3 t 547.7 t Afghanistan
1990s 535.5 t 12.8 t 522.7 t Afghanistan
2000s 644.3 t 20.6 t 623.7 t Afghanistan
2010s 747.5 t 3 t 744.5 t Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk — other uses, Afghanistan or Small island developing States?
Afghanistan, at 750 t against 3 t in Small island developing States as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk — other uses between Afghanistan and Small island developing States?
747 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Small island developing States?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Afghanistan and Small island developing States rank globally for silk — other uses?
Afghanistan ranks 12th and Small island developing States ranks 25th of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Small island developing States: Silk — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-other-uses-non-food/afghanistan/small-island-developing-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-other-uses-non-food/afghanistan/small-island-developing-states/">Afghanistan vs Small island developing States: Silk — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 6,574 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.