Land Locked Developing Countries vs Viet Nam: Silk — Import Quantity

Land Locked Developing Countries
81 t
in 2013
Viet Nam
635 t
in 2013
Land Locked Developing Countries rank
4th
Viet Nam rank
2nd

Silk — Import Quantity over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries
  • Viet Nam
05001.0k1.5k196119872013

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 635 t against 81 t in Land Locked Developing Countries, a difference of 554 t.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 7.8 times Land Locked Developing Countries's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 8 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries averaged higher in 2 and Viet Nam in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1960s 0 t 4.11 t 4.11 t Viet Nam
1970s 0 t 1.9 t 1.9 t Viet Nam
1980s 3.8 t 0 t 3.8 t Land Locked Developing Countries
1990s 522.1 t 95 t 427.1 t Land Locked Developing Countries
2000s 384.8 t 442.2 t 57.4 t Viet Nam
2010s 48 t 657 t 609 t Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher silk — import quantity, Land Locked Developing Countries or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 635 t against 81 t in Land Locked Developing Countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in silk — import quantity between Land Locked Developing Countries and Viet Nam?
554 t, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries and Viet Nam?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries and Viet Nam rank globally for silk — import quantity?
Land Locked Developing Countries ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 8 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Silk — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries vs Viet Nam: Silk — Import Quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-import-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/silk-import-quantity/land-locked-developing-countries/viet-nam-2/">Land Locked Developing Countries vs Viet Nam: Silk — Import Quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Silk — Import Quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
135 places, 6,564 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.