Guyana vs Rwanda: Share of employment by sex in industry: Employment in off-farm
Share of employment by sex in industry: Employment in off-farm over time
- Guyana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 45.89 % against 45.43 % in Guyana, a difference of 0.46 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Guyana ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 157 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.16 % | 43.21 % | 2.04 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 42.48 % | 45.11 % | 2.63 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 44.54 % | 45.31 % | 0.7733 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employment by sex in industry: employment in off-farm, Guyana or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 45.89 % against 45.43 % in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of employment by sex in industry: employment in off-farm between Guyana and Rwanda?
- 0.46 %, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Rwanda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Guyana and Rwanda rank globally for share of employment by sex in industry: employment in off-farm?
- Guyana ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 93rd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of employment by sex in industry: Employment in off-farm agrifood systems — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Non-agricultural agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.