Dominican Republic vs Rwanda: Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in
Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in over time
- Dominican Republic
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 44.33 % against 43.86 % in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.47 %.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 42nd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 68 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.29 % | 54.02 % | 12.73 % | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 42.48 % | 57.81 % | 15.33 % | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in, Dominican Republic or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 44.33 % against 43.86 % in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in between Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
- 0.47 %, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Rwanda rank globally for share of employees in [industry] out of total employment in?
- Dominican Republic ranks 42nd and Rwanda ranks 41st of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of Employees in [industry] out of total employment in [industry] by [sex]: Total AFS employment — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National — Agrifood systems. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.