Congo vs Oceania: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time
- Congo
- Oceania
How they compare
Congo currently reports 58 % against 31 % in Oceania, a difference of 27 %.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.9 times Oceania's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 31st and Oceania ranks 31st of 166 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.8 % | 27.4 % | 32.4 % | Congo |
| 2010s | 60 % | 29.4 % | 30.6 % | Congo |
| 2020s | 58.5 % | 31 % | 27.5 % | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, Congo or Oceania?
- Congo, at 58 % against 31 % in Oceania as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between Congo and Oceania?
- 27 %, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Oceania?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Congo and Oceania rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
- Congo ranks 31st and Oceania ranks 31st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.