Botswana vs Peru: Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers
Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers over time
- Botswana
- Peru
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 51 % against 50 % in Peru, a difference of 1 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Peru ahead.
Botswana ranks 47th and Peru ranks 50th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.1 % | 57.5 % | 7.4 % | Peru |
| 2010s | 54.5 % | 51.4 % | 3.1 % | Botswana |
| 2020s | 51.5 % | 50 % | 1.5 % | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers, Botswana or Peru?
- Botswana, at 51 % against 50 % in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers between Botswana and Peru?
- 1 %, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Peru?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and Peru rank globally for share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers?
- Botswana ranks 47th and Peru ranks 50th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.