Serbia vs Southern Europe: SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture
SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture over time
- Serbia
- Southern Europe
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.19 against 0.28 in Southern Europe, a difference of 0.91.
That makes Serbia's figure about 4.2 times Southern Europe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Southern Europe ahead.
Serbia ranks 23rd and Southern Europe ranks 23rd of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Southern Europe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Southern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3086 | 0.4186 | 0.11 | Southern Europe |
| 2010s | 0.322 | 0.29 | 0.032 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.656 | 0.288 | 0.368 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture, Serbia or Southern Europe?
- Serbia, at 1.19 against 0.28 in Southern Europe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture between Serbia and Southern Europe?
- 0.91, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Southern Europe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Southern Europe rank globally for sdg 2.a.1: highest government level — sdg 2.a.1: agriculture?
- Serbia ranks 23rd and Southern Europe ranks 23rd of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as SDG 2.a.1: highest government level — SDG 2.a.1: Agriculture Orientation Index (AOI) for Government Expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.