Land locked developing countries vs Russian Federation: Rubber — Other uses

Land locked developing countries
31,070 t
in 2013
Russian Federation
76,979 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries rank
3rd
Russian Federation rank
22nd

Rubber — Other uses over time

  • Land locked developing countries
  • Russian Federation
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119872013

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 76,979 t against 31,070 t in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 45,909 t.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.5 times Land locked developing countries's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Land locked developing countries ahead.

Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 22nd of 14 regions.

Across the 3 decades both report, Land locked developing countries averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land locked developing countries Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 19,275 t 10,482 t 8,793 t Land locked developing countries
2000s 22,068 t 35,997 t 13,929 t Russian Federation
2010s 27,269 t 61,711 t 34,442 t Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber — other uses, Land locked developing countries or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 76,979 t against 31,070 t in Land locked developing countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber — other uses between Land locked developing countries and Russian Federation?
45,909 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and Russian Federation?
22 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2013.
How do Land locked developing countries and Russian Federation rank globally for rubber — other uses?
Land locked developing countries ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 22nd of 14 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land locked developing countries vs Russian Federation: Rubber — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/russian-federation-2/">Land locked developing countries vs Russian Federation: Rubber — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.