Land locked developing countries vs Romania: Rubber β€” Other uses

Land locked developing countries
31,070 t
in 2013
Romania
49,512 t
in 2013
Land locked developing countries rank
11th
Romania rank
26th

Rubber β€” Other uses over time

  • Land locked developing countries
  • Romania
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119872013

How they compare

Romania currently reports 49,512 t against 31,070 t in Land locked developing countries, a difference of 18,442 t.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.6 times Land locked developing countries's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Land locked developing countries ranks 11th and Romania ranks 26th of 12 regions.

Across the 6 decades both report, Land locked developing countries averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land locked developing countries Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 3,309 t 22,765 t 19,455 t Romania
1970s 6,720 t 45,514 t 38,795 t Romania
1980s 10,551 t 32,950 t 22,399 t Romania
1990s 17,820 t 15,992 t 1,828 t Land locked developing countries
2000s 22,068 t 18,014 t 4,054 t Land locked developing countries
2010s 27,269 t 44,074 t 16,805 t Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rubber β€” other uses, Land locked developing countries or Romania?
Romania, at 49,512 t against 31,070 t in Land locked developing countries as of 2013.
What is the difference in rubber β€” other uses between Land locked developing countries and Romania?
18,442 t, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land locked developing countries and Romania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2013.
How do Land locked developing countries and Romania rank globally for rubber β€” other uses?
Land locked developing countries ranks 11th and Romania ranks 26th of 12 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rubber β€” Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land locked developing countries vs Romania: Rubber β€” Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/rubber-other-uses-non-food/land-locked-developing-countries/romania/">Land locked developing countries vs Romania: Rubber β€” Other uses</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rubber β€” Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 9,268 data points, 1961–2013
Last refreshed

Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.